In
previous paragraphs the Kingdom of Heaven could be interpreted in terms of
the setting up of a society which includes (in dialogue) two societies
which emphasise either law (c/f time) or order (c/f place) Yet this parable introduces the sense of
an ‘end-time’ as in after one’s death.
There is a saying about life after death. “What for the Christian if there’s no
heaven. But what for the atheist if
there’s a hell!” Traditionally hell
has been depicted e.g. in the Sistine Chapel as a great fire. A problem with this imagery is that
people can tend to reject it. Or as some theologians do, it could be argued
that it conflicts with the sense of an all-loving God.
We
could reflect about this in terms of the cosmology of the "Big
Bang". It is now claimed and
demonstrated by many scientists that the "Big Bang" was the
beginning of our time and space.
But what happens to the life of the spirit when one’s body ceases to
function in both time and place? If
(as the believer of an after-life would claim) one continues to live on,
this could be in a dimension which is not confined to either time or space.
In such case one would not have the many distractions and pre-occupations
afforded in a world of time, change and material things. But if one's life has been unbalanced it
seems there would be a sense of isolation.
If
the very nature of the Originator of the Universe and all being, is that of
love, then someone who has
|