Continued

someone opened the eyes of a man who had been born blind.  If this man was not from God he could not have been able to do anything."  They (the Jews) answered and said to him "You were born wholly in sins and you are you teaching us?"  And so they cast him outside.  Jesus heard that they had cast him outside and finding him said "Do you believe in the Son of man?  The man answered and said "Who is he, sir that I may believe in him?"  Jesus said to him "You have seen him and he is the one who is (now) speaking with you."  He said "I believe, sir" and he worshipped him.  Jesus said "I came into this world for judgment so that those who do not see may see and the ones who see may become blind.  Now some of the Pharisees who were with him (Jesus) heard some of these things.  They said to him "Are we blind as well?"  Jesus said to them "If you were blind you would not have had sin.  But now that you say "We see" then your sin remains."

 

 

In these arguments with 'the Jews' in the paragraphs above there are many levels at work.  There is a pattern of repetition on the part of Jesus which has some parallels with the repetitive couplets of the psalms.  The original language spoken would have been Aramaic and there could have been elements of a melodious chant  (c/f The Koran and other Arabic poetry and even the Essenes).  Even so within the pattern of repetition Jesus gradually introduces new concepts in a step by step way until he reaches a conclusion “Before Abraham came to be I am”.

 

As well as being conscious of what Jesus was saying one can also be conscious of John the writer who is recording this.  At one point Jesus addresses 'the having believed Jews'.  Yet next he is telling them their father is the devil and they want to kill him. Is this an editing error?   Consider the position of the early church.  There would been 'believing Jews' who thought of themselves as Jews who happened to be Christian.  First priority for them would be the continuation of their Jewish law.  Yet John is telling them to let go of their detailed rituals. 'The word' of Jesus is setting them free.  In a second paragraph he talks of the need for the grain of wheat to fall into the ground and die.   Unless these people 'let go' others will be turned away from the church. At the turn of the first century the Jewish religion had by now adjusted to its loss of Temple worship.  Jews moved into the future with their focus on the Torah  the first five books of the Bible and the local synagogue.  But what would be the focus of Christians?  John puts forward Jesus as the center-point.  So he tells Jewish church members. 'Stop over-stressing your heritage from Abraham.'  Within the text Jesus says "Why are you trying to kill me?"  Unless church members (all of them) recognised Jesus as the Living Word they would be denying his full reality and in this way they would be trying to kill him.  In the pattern of the paragraphs it appears that just as Jesus delivers an ultimatum to his Jewish opponents, so the writer John is delivering an ultimatum to these Jewish Christians people as well.  In the meantime 'gentile' people are wanting to join the church

 

n07